Evidentia V3.1–We’Related APP Input – 1

March 17, 2017

In Evidentia V3.1 Cousin Research Tracker first try I got us started in this process, now I am going to start a new Cousin Tracker person, from the We’re Related APP.

Evidentia-05

I selected New Cousin and select the Pencil (Edit) ICON to start a New Research Log.

I have recorded the information from the APP on my smart phone and entered it into an EXCEL worksheet.

Evidentia-06

And will enter my side and to my We’re Related Cousin’s side.

Evidentia-07a

I entered the Common Ancestor from my spreadsheet into the MRCA (Most Recent Common Ancestor fields.

Evidentia-08

I entered my name the Select Self field and my APP Cousin’s name in the Select Cousin field. Since these three names are NOT in my database, I enter the name and hit the ENTER Key to add the name to this database.

In that list of names in the spreadsheet, I realized that I have some repeated names. So, I added the Birth and Death Year to the Common Ancestor. Since the APP doesn’t provide those dates in the APP, I don’t have those dates. (I don’t have that information, yet)

In the “Your Side” there is a green + sign and Add Descendant Of and a field will be there to enter names. Each name will have the birth and death year, as provided by the APP.

Here is the completed screen.

Evidentia-09

But, I don’t want reports show this, but it will be helpful when I work a little more with this database.

Once this is Saved, and I close this task, I go to the Manage List ICON and select List Manager.

Evidentia-10

With the list of individuals appears, I select each of my new entries and remove the Dates from the Name as shown on REPORTS field.

Evidentia-11

The previous list of cousins, now looks like this.

Evidentia-13

Here is an example, from my spreadsheet above, as to why I have done the name to include the dates.

Evidentia-12

I can tell that there were two Nathanial Allen’s and will see that it is a Grandfather / Grandson that I am working with through the rest of process.

So far, I have taken the information from the We’re Related APP and have that information into Evidentia.

I probably will not do may detailed blog posts on the use of Evidentia, like creating a Source, Creating a Citation, inputting the Claims and the other steps of Evidentia. I will do several blog posts on findings along the way.


Evidentia V3.1 Cousin Research Tracker first try

March 15, 2017

I recently  posted Evidentia v3.1 Cousin Research Tracker where I introduced the two new features. The Tracker and the Research Log.

After a quick download and installation, I found where I have access to the new feature. This is the “home” screen, or where Evidentia opened for me. I am looking in the upper right corner ICONS.

Evidentia-02

A little closer look at the horizontal lines to the left of the Help Menu

Evidentia-03

This opens Manage List menu.

Evidentia-04

Selecting the Cousin Research Tracker we are presented with:

Evidentia-06

Selecting and existing Cousin Research Log, or create a New One. Will show the New Cousin

Evidentia-07

This looks to me like a great place for the We’re Related APP, where the Common Ancestor would be put into the Most Recent Common Ancestor field.

We then can enter “Your Side” and the “Cousin Side”. I’ll not go into detail here, as I suspect that Ed Thompson will provide us with his continued great documentation and How To Videos.

I do want to point out the “SAVE” ICON (see the arrow), as we need to save our work in this feature. I forgot the first time, and had to redo a couple of entries. My bad, but wanted to share that.

I am going to work on my DNA Entry and my We’re Related entry in the near future.


Evidentia v3.1 Cousin Research Tracker

March 14, 2017

Evidentia-01

OK, that got my attention. a Cousin Tracker.

Please visit the Evidentia Google+ Community for more information and conversation: http://bit.ly/CR_Evidentia_Community

and the Evidentia Blog post

https://evidentiasoftware.com/cousin-research-tracker/

I had to look. The other term for this feature, “Possibility Tree” according to Ed, the developer. A place for me to put “profiles” that are not ready for my database. A place to start to evaluate their documentation, when found, using the power of this genealogy tool to help me prove this profile.

Two projects that I have been working on that this should be able to help. The We’re Related APP and DNA Results.

Downloaded the update, to bring my version up to Version 3.1.

Not only is the Cousin Tracker included by also Cousin Research Logs.

Evidentia-01a

I will publish a couple of blog posts on how I use this update to Evidentia solve these problems.  I have a DNA relationship to prove and a We’re Related relationship to prove or disprove. As it happens, these to “problems” are in one of my direct ancestor lines.

Please visit the Evidentia website using the link in the Right Column of this blog.

evidentia128_thumb


We’re Related–Update

January 31, 2017

Haven’t posted a status recently on my We’re Related APP Project. I am actively taking the “new’ APP Cousin’s and entering them into my We’re Related EXCEL Spreadsheet, into my genealogy database and syncing it to an Ancestry Member Tree.

Here is the Current Status:

Were_Related-327

I have 125 APP Cousins. 73 of which are Facebook Friends, 52 are the Famous folk, including 9 Presidents and 1 First Lady.

12 have been proven to be Half Cousins, where we had one common ancestor, but a different spouse. 4 Have NO Direct Relationship. They appear to have been two people with the same name and birth years, but after evaluating the data, proved to not have a direct relationship. I found 5 where the relationship was with the Spouse of the APP Cousin.

There have been 2 deaths in the Tree since the project started and a Birth.

If interest to me, is that I already had 32 of the 125 Common Ancestors in my database, with another 15 within 1 generation. Those 15 are the first to be put into my existing database after I return from RootsTech2017.

All four of my grandparents are about even;

  • Worthington = 36
  • Strode = 38
  • Johnston = 27
  • Cheyney = 22

Early Maryland, Early New England ancestors, for the first two, Johnston is one where I have a not well researched ancestor, and the Cheyney’s are early Pennsylvania, but I apparently haven’t done as much research on them at I should have. But I now have more information to work with.

The next step is to take that 1 Generation short list and but my APP data into my master file and work with the hints that I have already seen from the Ancestry Shaky Leaf Hints.


We’re Related APP–Another View

January 16, 2017

I have seen a Chart going around, called Ancestor Tracking. I did a blog post a while ago about this from on Master Genealogy Database:

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun – What’s Your Ancestral Name Number?

Here is what the Chart looked like in 2012

Were_Related-290

About 25% of the first 10 generations.

I decided to see what my We’re Related Database looks like, all from the APP.

Were_Related-289

I am now almost at 30%. This along means that I may be able to added these additional people to the database.

But, in reality, I actually have pushed back to more generations in my research.

Were_Related-288

Of course, the percentage doesn’t look very good, but it would be adding about 100 direct line Ancestors.

There is a note at the bottom of the chart that says “Unknown Names not counted”. I have those profiles in my database, may know a little about them, just don’t know their name. Mostly spouses of a person whose name I do know.

I am working a cleaning up my APP database before I take the APP data in enter it into my Master database. I was going to merge the APP Data into my Master database, but I think I am just going to hand enter the data, the same way I did in the APP Database. That forces me to really look at the data.

I have developed some tools within my database that I want to implement into my Master database based on this exercise.


We’re Related APP –16 Jan 2017 Update

January 16, 2017

Sorry, have been quiet recently, but still working on the We’re Related project. I think I may have had a break through on someone of interest in my database, but could not figure out where he fit in. But that’s for another Blog Post. My notes and earlier findings, along with the APP has given me some information to research.

I have 107 APP Cousins in my database and I have done some analysis that I want to share so far. Looking at the Common Ancestors from the APP, I have 30 of them in my existing database. Because I was tracking which of my Grandparents the Common Ancestor was part of “that line”, it didn’t surprise me which Line I have done the most research on, what were involved with the APP cousins.

Of the 30 Common Ancestors that are in my existing database 9 of them have issues. As it turns out, all 9 were through my most researched line. Here is what the issues are:

2

No Direct Relationship

2

Half Cousins

1

Spouse of the APP Cousin

4

Other issues

This comes after the data is in my database and the evaluation of the relations is review with the program I use. The 5 issue that I have identified are problems with a relationship around the Common Ancestor. For example: A second spouse, where I come down from one spouse and the APP Cousin was from the 2nd spouse.

I have been able to identify that the APP cousin was really the spouse of the APP Cousin.

The 4 with “other issues” are ones where I need to revisit the data entry and and APP data.

In addition to the 30, I have 15 more, where I am one generation short of the Common Ancestor in my existing database. 2 more Half Cousins appear and the Spouse of another Half Cousin. 2 need a little more research.

People in Database

2,046

Record Hints

8,699

Photo Hints

1,958

Story Hints

225

Based on my experience with the Hints, it would appear that the data isn’t too bad. From what I have experienced with hints, the Relationships, Dates, and Places increase the number of hints. The ones that I have followed or just looked at, they appear to be good hints to follow.

Of the 45 profiles mentioned above, 30 of them are Facebook Friends. 5 of my non-Facebook Friends are among the group where the Common Ancestor is already in my database and I haven’t found any issues with yet.

Clearly having Colonial New England and Maryland ancestors have helped these numbers.

5th Cousin 1x Removed to 9th Cousin 1x Removed are in the list of 45 people.


We’re Related APP–So where are we ?

January 3, 2017

I am caught up, at least until yesterday, with my data entry and analysis. For what ever that is worth.

APP Cousins

 

Famous folk

42

Facebook Friends

48

In Existing Database

 

Famous folk Common Ancestor

8

Facebook Friends Common Ancestor

17

Not in Database

 

Famous folk Common Ancestor

34

Facebook Friends Common Ancestor

31

One Generation Short

 

Famous folk Common Ancestor

8

Facebook Friends Common Ancestor

5

The One Generation Short means that I have the descendant of the Common Ancestor in my existing database. My next step is to fill that gap for my existing database.

I guess I was pleasantly surprised at the number of Common Ancestors that I already had in my database, or was only a generation short. It sort of is confirmation, to me, that my database is close. BUT, the Source of “my line” in the APP, is my own data. I can tell that by the number of times certain of my direct line ancestors appear in the APP.

When I go back to researching my own ancestors, I will focus on the results of the APP.

The Bad News is that I have one APP Cousin, where the APP has a several hundred year gap. I have 1 APP Cousin where I am a 1/2 Cousin, due to a 2nd marriage. I have 2 APP Cousin’s where I am related to the Spouse, and 3 APP Cousins that I have disproven.

I have been tracking, based on my Grandparents, where the APP Cousins fit in. ALL 4 Grandparents are represented, not necessarily equally, but are represented.

Two of my grandparents were from Colonial Pennsylvania and that was about 40 of the Common Ancestors. Colonial New England Ancestors are 24, and the other 26 were Colonial Maryland.

My APP Database has 1,738 people in it, and I just checked the Hints in the Ancestry Member Tree and there are 8,117 Record Hints, 1,950 Photos, and 206 Stories. So there is plenty or records to prove or disprove this database. I do not plan on use that database, but to return to my existing database, using the experience of this project to firm up my own research.

Looking at the Hints, there are many, many records that I have not seen before, with some records allowing me to get “across the pond” more frequently, because I am seeing those U.K. records in the hints.

I continue to think that the We’re Related APP is a Tool to help me expand my research. Actually, perhaps that is to Focus my research.

Bottom line here, I think this 2 month project has been worthwhile, for me at least, but attempting to evaluate this APP as a research tool. Can’t wait to get back to my own research.


%d bloggers like this: